Contraceptive Care Measures

Contraceptive care encompasses screening, education, counseling, and provision of contraceptives.1 Contraceptive care is an effective way to help people achieve their personal reproductive goals, including preventing or delaying pregnancy and achieving healthy spacing of births. It can also contribute to positive health outcomes such as reduced risk of gynecologic disorders, including a decreased risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer,2 decreased bleeding and pain with menstrual periods, and reduced health care costs.3

To promote client-centered delivery of contraceptive care, it is important that health care providers treat each person with respect, empathy, and understanding. Providers should also offer accurate, easy-to-understand information that is based on people’s needs and goals and that reflect their preferences and values. Those who wish to delay or prevent pregnancy should have access to a variety of contraceptive methods.

Gaps in access to and provision of contraceptive services remain relatively high in the United States. From 2017 to 2019, an estimated 37.2 million people ages 18 to 49 were in need of contraceptive services, and a recent study showed that one in three people had trouble accessing birth control and/or reproductive health services.4,5 There are substantial racial and socioeconomic disparities in contraceptive access and use. Studies suggest that these disparities are driven by structural barriers such as the cost of contraceptives, access to health insurance, gender and racial bias, distrust in the medical system, and pharmacy-level barriers such as pharmacist shortages.6

To assess access to and provision of contraception, the Office of Population Affairs (OPA) developed a set of contraceptive care measures, endorsed by CMS’ consensus-based entity (CBE #2902, #2903, #2904).

Postpartum Women

  1. Contraceptive Care – Postpartum Most & Moderately Effective Methods: Among women aged 15-44 years who had a live birth, the percentage that is provided a most effective (i.e., sterilization, implants, IUD/IUS) or moderately effective (i.e., injectables, oral pills, patch, or ring) contraceptive method within 3 days of delivery and within 90 days of delivery.
  2. Contraceptive Care – Postpartum Access to LARC: Among women aged 15-44 years who had a live birth, the percentage that is provided a LARC method (i.e., implants or IUD/IUS) within 3 days of delivery and within 90 days of delivery.

The contraceptive care measures use claims data and are intended to encourage providers to screen for pregnancy preferences, offer the full range of most and moderately effective contraceptive methods, and use a client-centered approach to contraceptive counseling. The measures align with clinical guidelines that promote the provision of contraception in a safe, effective, and client-centered way.

How to Use the Measures

Quality measures can be used by payors, states, plans and providers and other stakeholders to identify gaps in health care quality. By analyzing measure rates, stakeholders can track the impact of interventions, such as enhanced access to care and quality improvement initiatives, to address potential barriers and gaps in care, and monitor improvement over time.

The contraceptive care measures can inform quality improvement initiatives by identifying and monitoring gaps in the provision of most and moderately effective methods and access to LARC to women at risk of unintended pregnancy and after childbirth.3 The measures were CBE endorsed at the state, health plan, facility, and clinician group level. Measure performance rates can help health care providers learn about their patient population, identify best practices in care, and track quality improvement progress, acting as a roadmap for enhancing the quality of care and patient satisfaction. In addition, many states report these measures to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Child and Adult Core Set program to drive improvement in the quality of contraceptive care provided to Medicaid beneficiaries.

The Contraceptive Care measures do not have a benchmark for contraceptive uptake or chosen contraceptive method. Some people will make an informed decision to choose a lower-efficacy method or no method of contraception when providers offer them the full range of methods and there are no logistical or financial barriers to access. For the same reason, it is not appropriate to use the Contraceptive Care measures in a pay-for-performance context as these measures are designed to support quality improvement.

Starting federal fiscal year (FFY) 2024, reporting of the Child Core Set, which includes OPA’s contraceptive care measures, is mandatory for all states. States should not interpret this mandatory reporting as a desire to reach higher rates of contraceptive provision, but rather as an aim to capture all contraceptive provision rates. Higher rates of contraceptive provision are not associated with higher quality of contraceptive care provided to patients because these rates do not necessarily reflect patient preferences or goals.

Measure performance rates can be used to help assess if there is room for improvement in provision of most or moderately effective contraceptive methods and to identify potential barriers to LARC access.

Limitations of Claims Data

Administrative claims data have some limitations when used to assess the quality of contraceptive care. One key limitation is that claims data do not capture several aspects of people’s risk of unintended pregnancy: sexual experience, pregnancy intention, sterilization, LARC insertion in the year before the measurement year, and infertility for non-contraceptive reasons (unless the woman had a sterilization procedure during the measurement year). These limitations can be partly addressed by using data from the National Survey of Family Growth to help interpret the performance measure rates for the provision of most and moderately effective methods of contraception.

Learn more about interpreting rates for the contraceptive care measures.

Related Contraceptive Care Measures

The Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) measure, which is stewarded by the University of California, San Francisco, is a person-reported outcome performance measure that evaluates the person-centeredness of contraceptive counseling. The PCCC scale summarizes three domains of contraceptive counseling: (1) interpersonal connection, (2) adequate information, and (3) decision support. To measure these three domains, surveys are administered to people immediately after a contraceptive counseling visit. CMS’ consensus-based entity (CBE) endorsed the PCCC measure in 2020 (CBE #3543).

In addition, OPA helped fund the development of two electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) to assess the percentage of people who receive contraceptive services that wanted them. Unlike the claims-based measures, the eCQMs focus on people who are interested in contraceptive services. Both measures were endorsed by CMS’ CBE for trial use in December 2022. The postpartum eCQM assesses the percentage of people who (1) received or had documented use of most or moderately effective contraception during the postpartum period and (2) received a LARC during the postpartum period (CBE #3682e). The non-postpartum eCQM assesses the percentage of people who wanted contraceptive services that: (1) received or had documented use of most or moderately effective contraception and (2) received a LARC during the calendar year (CBE #3699e). Both eCQMs focus on people who indicated a desire for contraception; those who did not indicate such a desire were excluded from the measures.

Clinical Guidelines

Clinical practice guidelines, or “clinical guidelines,” are consensus- or evidence-based statements that include recommendations to help clinicians (1) make decisions during specific clinical circumstances and (2) optimize patient care.7 The contraceptive care measures are informed by the following clinical guidelines, among others:

Measure Specifications

Instructions for Calculating the Measures

Technical Release Notes (TRN)

2023 All Women measure specifications (CCW)

2023 Postpartum Women measure specifications (CCP)

Value sets, code lookup tables, and SAS code

2023 CCW TRNs - Excel file

2023 CCP TRNs - Excel file

CCW: Contraceptive Care All Women measure.
CCP: Contraceptive Care Postpartum Women measure.


Footnotes

1 Update to the Women’s Preventive Services Guidelines. (2022, January 12). Federal Register. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/01/12/2022-00465/update-to-the-womens-preventive-services-guidelines back to top

2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015). Access to contraception (Committee Opinion Number 615). https://www.acog.org/en/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2015/01/access-to-contraception back to top

3 Moniz, M. H., Gavin, L.E., & Dalton, V.K. (2017). Performance measures for contraceptive care: A new tool to enhance access to contraception. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 130(5), 1121–1125 doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002314. back to top

4 Zapata, L. B., Pazol, K., Curtis, K. M., Kane, D. J., Jatlaoui, T. C., Folger, S. G., Okoroh, E. M., Cox, S., & Whiteman, M. K. (2021). Need for contraceptive services among women of reproductive age — 45 jurisdictions, United States, 2017–2019 (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol. 70). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. back to top

5 Lindberg, L. D., VandeVusse, A., Mueller, J., & Kirstein, M. (2020). Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from the 2020 Guttmacher Survey of Reproductive Health Experiences. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/early-impacts-covid-19-pandemic-findings-2020-guttmacher-survey-reproductive-health back to top

6 Sutton, M. Y., Anachebe, N. F., Lee, R., & Skanes, H. (2021). Racial and ethnic disparities in reproductive health services and outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 137(2), 225–233 doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004224. back to top

7 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines, Field, M. J., & Lohr, K. N. (Eds.). (1990). Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. National Academies Press (US). back to top